Names With Succession Notations

So, how does one calculate names with succession notations?

Example: Joe Doe, III

My preference is to do the calculations with the name as first recorded, probably a birth certificate. If uncertain about whether or not to use the succession notation in the calculation, do a reading for both and see which applies most.

For readings true to the birth certificate, type into the form what’s recorded on the certificate. If “III” is typed, calculate the three I’s. If “3rd.” is typed, calculate the digit 3 and the letters r and d.

It’s not our definition of words that count in these calculations; rather, it’s the vibrations of the individual characters that were recorded.

The vibrations of the first recording of the name will always be with the person, even through name changes. The original name vibrations probably will be more in the background when names change, but will always be present to some extent.

The more a person identifies with a name, the more power the vibrations of the name have and the more the vibrations of other name variations are in the background.

Similarly with succession notations. For “Name III,” if the person identifies strongly with “Name” and hardly with “Name III”, then readings of “Name” will seem more accurate because “Name III” will then be more in the background.

The vibrations of every permutation of an individual’s name are all present. The relative force of the vibrations which are present have to do with the perception of the person they apply to, which name the individual most strongly identifies with. Individual perception and self-identification do not determine which vibrations are present. But they do determine the force of the vibrations relative to each other.

It’s part of the reason I like numerology so much. It doesn’t stick people into unyielding slots.